 12/03/2007 21:15 |
|
|
innanzitutto tutti quelli che posteranno qua devono rimanere in tema e non spammare onde evitare chiusure di thread
nano guerriero via ffz mi ha detto che in un forum dicono:
"Hannibal was from the city of ancient (not present) carthage as we all know , and carthaginian were desendents of the phonicans. Ancient phonicans were semetic people. Semitic is a linguistic term referring to a subdivision of largely Middle Eastern Afro-Asiatic. Afro-asiatic!!!!!!! not indo-earopean, Afro-asiatic, AFro meaning blackkkkkk. not white. The reason why there are many north africans and arabs that look white in todays middle east and north africa was due to the greek invasion of alexander the great and the later romans which raped and intermarried with locals black women of persia. That is why middle eastern people like saddam hussien can resemble a greek or an italian man. if you read about alexander the great you would read that he made his soldier intermarry with persian women. yet the many brown skinned arabs in persian and america are enough edvidence that arabs are of black origin. Now as for the ancient city of carhtage i quote from wikipedia.com and many scholars it saids "the Third Punic War, instigated by Rome's actions designed to guarantee that Carthage would never have the ability to threaten Rome again, ended with the complete destruction of the city of Carthage, the annexation of the last remnants of Carthaginian territory by Rome". so do u understand that the city of carthage which was of ancient not present phonican, was destroyed. and as we all know that Romans took the lifestyles of culture they invaded. thus todays light skinned people of tunnis ancient carthage are not indeed ancient carthage but roman decendents. just like they did to isreal, they expelled almost all true hebrew from isreal and took over the land. that explains why todays jews are white, becuase there ancestors were really Roman and not hebrew. so you see Hannibal the carhtaginian was a semetic black man. not the white red skinned (due to lack of sun resistance) man you say he is. and u got it buddy Jesus was a Black man. if your read the bible it describes him of having white wooly hair and arms and feet like brass burnt ( you got that BURNT) on to a furnis."
tutte cavolate poichè per quanto riguarda i fenici, lo si ha benissimo negli antichi egizi dove essi erano di pelle bianco/olivastra anche se i nubiani erano neri. I fenici erano di pelle olivastra e non nera in quanto nessun popolo che li circondava ai tempi aveva la pelle scura afro e per mescolare un dna cambiando pelle di un popolo ci vogliono millenni. ancora oggi i palestinesi sono olivastri sebbene essi hanno avuto influenze latine coi romani
per quanto riguarda i punici, è il vecchio discorso: Africa= neri=cartagine=africa=neri! è una boiata dei fratelli di colore americani stto effetto di onnipotenza e onnipresenza. I numidi erano di carnagione scura perchè erano sempre vissuti li in mezzo alle sabbie. i cartaginesi è impossibile che avessero pelle scura poichè
1 non sono sempre stati li ma si sono trasferiti e lo si nota anche nei ritrovamenti di Utica punica
2 non potevano avere la pelle scura poichè il tipico abbigliamento punico femminile li faceva portare vesti lunghe, con il copricapo tipico punico e il velo e gli uomini stessa cosa solo senza velo
3 un eventuale massiccio cambiamento di colore di pelle cioè pigmentazione richiede minio 5000 anni di continui mescolamenti interraziali e questo non poteva avvenire
4 testi greci, latini, romani, egiziani, persiani descrivono i fenici/punici con pelle olivastra |
|
|
|